AAAM Position Statement on Blood Alcohol Concentration Limit when Driving

WHEREAS critical driving performance is significantly impaired at blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) of 0.05 g/dL and above, and, for most drivers, impairment begins at BACs below 0.05 g/dL, and

WHEREAS the risk of a driver being involved in a crash increases significantly at BACs equal to or exceeding 0.05 g/dL, and

WHEREAS lowering the legal limit of BAC to 0.05 g/dL or lower when driving reduces alcohol-related crashes and fatalities, and

WHEREAS a BAC limit of no more than 0.05 g/dL is a reasonable standard with public support,

BE IT RESOLVED that all jurisdictions should adopt a limit of no more than 0.05 g/dL as the legal limit for BAC when driving.

Adopted: October 2009, updated February 2022


  • Virtually all drivers are impaired at 0.05 g/dL BAC. Laboratory and test track research shows that most drivers, even those who frequently reach BACs of 0.15 g/dL or greater, are impaired at 0.05 g/dL BAC and higher regarding critical driving tasks. There are significant decrements in performance in areas such as braking, steering, lane changing, judgment, and divided attention at 0.05 g/dL BAC. Some studies report that decrements in driving performance in some of these tasks are as high as 30%-50% at 0.05 g/dL BAC compared to the same subjects at 0.00 g/dL BAC.

  • The risk of being involved in a crash increases significantly at 0.05 g/dL BAC. The risk of a driver being involved in a crash increases at each positive BAC level (0.01, 0.02, 0.03, etc.). It rises very rapidly after a driver reaches or exceeds 0.05 g/dL BAC compared to drivers with no alcohol in their blood systems. Studies indicate that the relative risk of being killed in a single-vehicle crash for drivers with BACs of .05 to .079 g/dL is at least 7 times higher, and could be as much as 21 times higher, compared to drivers with a BAC of 0.00 g/dL.
  • Lowering the BAC limit to 0.05 g/dL is a proven effective countermeasure. Alcohol-related traffic fatalities have been significantly reduced in several countries when the limit has been reduced to 0.05 g/dL BAC. While studies in European nations, Japan, and Australia each use a different methodology to evaluate these effects, the evidence is consistent and persuasive that crashes involving drinking drivers decrease at least 5% (and up to 18%) after a country lowers their illegal BAC limit from 0.08 g/dL to 0.05 g/dL BAC. A meta-analysis of international studies on lowering the BAC limit found a 5% decline in non-fatal alcohol-related crashes, a 9% decline in fatal alcohol-related crashes from lowering the BAC from 0.10 g/dL to 0.08 g/dL, and an 11% decline in fatal alcohol-related crashes from lowering the BAC to 0.05 g/dL or lower. In the United States, reducing the BAC limit from 0.08 g/dL to 0.05 g/dL in the State of Utah reduced the fatal crash rate 20% from 2016 to 2019, and the fatality rate was reduced 18%. In comparison, the rest of the United States showed reductions of just 6% in both fatal crash rate and fatality rate during that period.
  • An upper BAC limit of 0.05 g/dL is a reasonable standard to set that has public support. A 0.05 g/dL BAC is not typically reached with a couple of beers after work or with a glass of wine or two with dinner. It takes at least four drinks for the average 170-pound (77 kg) male to exceed 0.05 g/dL BAC in two hours on an empty stomach and three drinks for the 137-pound (62 kg) female. The BAC level reached depends upon a person’s age, gender, weight, whether there is food in their stomach, and their metabolic rate. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) surveys in the United States show that most people would not drive after consuming two or three drinks in an hour (equivalent to 0.05 g/dL or lower) and believe the limit should be no higher than the BAC level associated with that. A 2016 survey indicated that 63% of drivers in the United States support lowering the illegal BAC from 0.08 g/dL to 0.05 g/dL. In 2019, Utah became the first state in the United States to lower its BAC limit to 0.05 g/dL, and other states have expressed interest in reducing their limit as well. The World Health Organization maintains a database of the BAC limits for every nation, and, as of 2018, over 100 countries around the world have a BAC limit of 0.05 g/dL or lower. Many of the world’s most populous nations are at or below this limit, including Philippines, Turkey, Germany, Thailand, and South Africa (all at 0.05 g/dL), Russia (0.04 g/dL), India and Japan (both at 0.03 g/dL), and China and Colombia (both at 0.02 g/dL). Over 20 countries, including the large nations of Pakistan, Brazil, Bangladesh, Iran, and Sudan have a total ban or “zero tolerance” for drinking and driving. However, there are still many nations, most notably the United States, that have national BAC limits of 0.08 g/dL.


Arnold, L. and Tefft, B. (2016). Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol and Marijuana: Beliefs and Behaviors, United States, 2013-2015. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, DC, May 2016, 1-19.

Berning, A. (2022, February). Evaluation of Utah’s .05 BAC per se law (Traffic Tech Technology Transfer Series. Report No. DOT HS 813 234). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Blomberg R. et al. Crash Risk of Alcohol Involved Driving: A Case-Control Study. Stamford, CT: Dunlap & Associates, Inc.; 2005.

Brooks C. and Zaal D. (1993) Effects of a reduced alcohol limit in driving, in Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety (Utzelmann HD, Berghous G, Kroj G eds), pp 860-865, Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Cologne, Germany.

Compton R. and Berning A. Drug and Alcohol Crash Risk. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety, Administration; 2015. DOT HS 812 117.

Dang, J. (2008). Statistical analysis of alcohol-related driving trends, 1982-2005. (DOT HS 810 942). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved from

Fell, J. and Voas, R. (2014). The effectiveness of a 0.05 blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving in the United States. Addiction, 109; 869-874.

Fell, J. et al. (2016). Can Progress in Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities be Resumed? Results of a Workshop sponsored by the Transportation Research Board, Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Transportation Committee (ANB50). Traffic Injury Prevention, 17(8), 771-781.

Fell, J. and Scherer, M. (2017). Estimation of the Potential Effectiveness of Lowering the Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Limit for Driving from .08 to .05 grams per deciliter in the United States. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 41 (12), 2128-2139.

Ferrara, S., Zancaner, S., and Georgetti, R. (1994). Low blood alcohol levels and driving impairment. A review of experimental studies and international legislation. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 106(4), 169-177.

Hingson, R., Heeren, T., and Winter, M. (1996). Lowering state legal blood alcohol limits to 0.08 percent:  The effect on fatal motor vehicle crashes. American Journal of Public Health, 86(9), 1297-1299.

Homel, R. (1994) Drink-driving law enforcement and the legal blood alcohol limit in New South Wales. Accident Analysis and Prevention 26:147-155.

Howat, P., Sleet, D., and Smith, I. (1991). Alcohol and driving: Is the 0.05% blood alcohol concentration limit justified? Drug and Alcohol Review, 10, 151-166.

Irwin, C. et al. (2017). Effects of acute alcohol consumption on measures of simulated driving: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 102, 248-266.

McKnight, A. et al. (2002). Sobriety tests for low blood alcohol concentrations. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(3), 305-311.

Moskowitz, H. et al. (2000). Driver characteristics and impairment at various BACs. (DOT HS 809 075). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Moskowitz, H., and Fiorentino, D. (2000). A review of the literature on the effects of low doses of alcohol on driving-related skills. (DOT HS 809 028). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Nagata T. et al. (2008) Effectiveness of a law to reduce alcohol-impaired driving in Japan. Injury Prevention 14:19-23.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1994). Computing a BAC Estimate. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

Royal, D. (2000 December). National survey of drinking and driving: Attitudes and behavior: 1999 (DOT HS 809 190 – Vol. I: Findings). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Teutsch, S., Geller, A., and Negussie, Y. (2018). Getting to Zero Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities: A Comprehensive Approach to a Persistent Problem. Committee on Accelerating Progress to Reduce Alcohol-Impaired Driving Fatalities, National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

Thomas, F. et al. (2022, February). Evaluation of Utah’s .05 BAC per se law (Report No. DOT HS 813 233). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Tsai, Y. et al. (2019). The effect of lowering the legal blood alcohol concentration limit on driving under the influence (DUI) in southern Taiwan: a cross-sectional retrospective analysis. BMJ open, 9(4), e026481.

Voas, R., Tippetts, A., and Fell, J. (2000). The relationship of alcohol safety laws to drinking drivers in fatal crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32(4), 483-492.

Voas, R. et al. (2012). Alcohol-related risk of driver fatalities: An update using 2007 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(3), 341-350.

World Health Organization (2013). List of countries’ BAC limits for driving: World Health Organization; 2013. Available online:*;BACGROUP:*

Wagenaar, A. et al. (2007). Effects of legal BAC limits on fatal crash involvement: Analyses of 28 states from 1976 through 2002. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 493-499.

Yadav, A. and Velaga, N. (2020). Alcohol-impaired driving in rural and urban road environments: Effect on speeding behaviour and crash probabilities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 140, 105512.

Zador, P. et al. (2000). Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: An update using 1996 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(3), 387-395.